Football manager 2021 sale7/26/2023 You’d get results and statistics on matches your team played in previous versions of the game, but they were always a little vague. ![]() Match engineĬhief among the improvements is a new, in-depth match engine. There’s a new match engine, detailed career mode, and more. Although there’s some truth to this idea, these games, especially Football Manager 2021, often have a few new tricks up their sleeves.įootball Manager 2021 is built on the same engine as the 2020 version but adds some much-needed and welcome upgrades. For the past decade, though, there has been no hiding place.With other football sim games like FIFA 2021 and even Football Manager 2020, it’s a common belief that the next installment is more of the same. Until then, the Glazers could use United’s success on the field to deflect from the club’s balance sheets. You don’t need an MBA to understand that allowing David Gill and Sir Alex Ferguson – your chief executive and greatest football manager – to leave in the same summer was rank incompetence. Meanwhile the rest of the Glazers’ record is little better. Last week it voted to cap leveraged buyouts at around 65% of a club’s value, banning the type of big-debt takeover used by the Glazers. And the host? Well, that doesn’t end well.Īt least the Premier League has finally appeared to recognise such behaviour isn’t good for the game. In essence, the Glazers resemble the zombie-ant fungus seen on nature documentaries, which takes over its host and drains its vital nutrients from the inside out, to its benefit. In very simple terms, the debt went from almost nothing pre-Glazers, to more than half a billion when they took over, then over £700m in 2010, and now £535.7m in early 2023. ![]() Photograph: Marc Atkins/Getty ImagesĮven now the debt is still eye-watering. In effect, United paid for their own takeover, as well as their continued upkeep.Ĭo-owner Avram Glazer has pocketed millions from the club since 2015 despite the downturn in performance. It meant that Glazer only had to use £272m of his own money to buy a club valued at £810m – with the rest borrowed using the assets of the company as collateral for the loan. It is astonishing, even with 18 years’ distance, to remember that United were once a debt-free and profit-making club – before being loaded with £540m of debts purely so that Malcolm Glazer could make himself owner.Īnd it is also frankly incredible that the Premier League, and a Labour government, saw no reason to object to Glazer using a leveraged buyout to fund his takeover – even though United fans warned of the grim consequences. Even so, most believe we are now in the endgame.īut when the takeover fog does eventually lift, and United’s new owners swan into Old Trafford with smiles and promises, the indelible stain the Glazers have left on English football must not be fast‑forwarded over, or forgotten. That is partly because of the opaqueness of the process, and the uncertainty of the Glazers’ full motives – along with the way Raine, the US bank running the sale, has repeatedly tried to ramp up the price. That said, it is understood both parties were still in active and detailed discussions last week, and few behind the scenes are willing to make firm bets. The sense both publicly and privately is that Sheikh Jassim bin Hamad al-Thani’s Nine Two foundation has slipped ahead of Jim Ratcliffe’s Ineos bid after making a fifth and final offer this month. If you were an agent of a player lined up for a move to Old Trafford, wouldn’t you wait to see if the Qataris, with almost bottomless pockets, took over first? ![]() But every week that passes without a sale risks jeopardising United’s chances of improving again next season. They appear to want to go out the same way. They started their 18-year-old reign at the club by stiffing fans. At least the Glazers have been consistent.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |